I was recently reading Light On Life which is a book by Iyengar in which he talks about his life as a yogi, a teacher, and as a husband, and father.
I have considerable resepect for the man and am humbled by the depth of his dedication, influence, focus and heart. He has certainly been one of the most important human beings to bring yoga to the West and has influenced just about any major yoga teacher in the West as well.
However, there are also some real concerns I have with Iyengar type teaching. Mainly it seems rather dry, at times, and there also seems to be a type of rigidity, authoritarian style to the teaching that can rub me the wrong way often.
I was keeping all of these thoughts in my mind as I was reading the book and at one point in the book he is talking about the illusionary quality of the Self and he says that when his wife of 30 years passed away he did not shed one tear.
He says he will not grieve over the death of an illusion.
And I was kind of stunned. Stunned in a tender way because I both understand his point and disagree. I disagree because it just has been so unbelievably healing for me to spend a lot of time shedding tears about the losses I have suffered in my life and I can only assume that others would also feel healed by doing this emotional purging. I felt a type of sadness that this man has not given himself that opportunity.
I was mentioning this to a yoga teacher friend of mine and he said that Iyengar comes from a very classical style of yoga and that I seem to be more inclined to a Tantra style or persepctive that focuses a great deal on diving right into all experience as a means towards liberation.
So I am just throwing these ideas and thoughts out here to see what the community thinks...am very curious.
peace to all,
gideon




